<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DesperatelyObvious.com</title>
	<link>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com</link>
	<description>A Look at the War on Terror and the U.S. Quest for World Dominance</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on NY Times: How to Fabricate History by Public Criminal Record For South</title>
		<link>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=28#comment-849</link>
		<author>Public Criminal Record For South</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=28#comment-849</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gaston County Criminal Records For Residents...&lt;/strong&gt;

Gaston County in the State of North Carolina has several databases of information on criminal records. These sources of Gaston County criminal records deal mostly with convictions. This means that the databases that are publicly accessible may not incl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gaston County Criminal Records For Residents&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Gaston County in the State of North Carolina has several databases of information on criminal records. These sources of Gaston County criminal records deal mostly with convictions. This means that the databases that are publicly accessible may not incl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do we win peace? by steven e. streight aka vaspers</title>
		<link>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=34#comment-813</link>
		<author>steven e. streight aka vaspers</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=34#comment-813</guid>
		<description>McCain, like his predecessor Cain of Genesis, does indeed understand and submit to the iron doctrine of radical militarism: Eternal War and Imperialistic Occupation of Sovereign Lands.

McCain does not understand why continual war, invasion, regime change, and occupation is wrong. He is against torture however, and I applaud him for wanting to destroy Guantanomo prison camp.

Jesus would not torture, bomb, or waterboard anybody. Jesus cursed the military by pronouncing: "blessed are the peacemakers".

Victory? In a war that consists of bombing a nation, imposing our regime, occupying it, and setting up bases for permanent colonization? You want to succeed in that? You want victory in this wicked mess?

That's like catching a rapist in the act, and letting him finish the job, since he's already there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain, like his predecessor Cain of Genesis, does indeed understand and submit to the iron doctrine of radical militarism: Eternal War and Imperialistic Occupation of Sovereign Lands.</p>
<p>McCain does not understand why continual war, invasion, regime change, and occupation is wrong. He is against torture however, and I applaud him for wanting to destroy Guantanomo prison camp.</p>
<p>Jesus would not torture, bomb, or waterboard anybody. Jesus cursed the military by pronouncing: &#8220;blessed are the peacemakers&#8221;.</p>
<p>Victory? In a war that consists of bombing a nation, imposing our regime, occupying it, and setting up bases for permanent colonization? You want to succeed in that? You want victory in this wicked mess?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s like catching a rapist in the act, and letting him finish the job, since he&#8217;s already there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Masters of Health Care by Local Jobs Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=33#comment-720</link>
		<author>Local Jobs Guide</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=33#comment-720</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Local Jobs Guide...&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn't understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Local Jobs Guide&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do we win peace? by Tyler Tarwater</title>
		<link>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=34#comment-670</link>
		<author>Tyler Tarwater</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=34#comment-670</guid>
		<description>Interesting perspective.  I think groups like GPJC try and work heavily within the system.  Anti-war blogger David Swanson (http://www.davidswanson.org/) writes almost exclusively about Congressional matters like impeachment, bills calling for withdrawal, etc.  Still, perhaps there needs to be more popular education on these topics?

Congress still has the power to stop the war.  All they have to do is stop funding it.  They aren't interested in doing that though.  Obama, Clinton, and Edward just agreed in refusing to pledge to withdrawal the troops before 2013.  Kucinich seems to be the only representative (and presidential candidate) serious about ending the war.

I think the peace constituency is being heard, I just don't think it is large or loud enough yet.  The anti-war movement has to create costs for the managers of democracy that outweigh the costs of a free Iraq and Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting perspective.  I think groups like GPJC try and work heavily within the system.  Anti-war blogger David Swanson (http://www.davidswanson.org/) writes almost exclusively about Congressional matters like impeachment, bills calling for withdrawal, etc.  Still, perhaps there needs to be more popular education on these topics?</p>
<p>Congress still has the power to stop the war.  All they have to do is stop funding it.  They aren&#8217;t interested in doing that though.  Obama, Clinton, and Edward just agreed in refusing to pledge to withdrawal the troops before 2013.  Kucinich seems to be the only representative (and presidential candidate) serious about ending the war.</p>
<p>I think the peace constituency is being heard, I just don&#8217;t think it is large or loud enough yet.  The anti-war movement has to create costs for the managers of democracy that outweigh the costs of a free Iraq and Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do we win peace? by Katie O</title>
		<link>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=34#comment-669</link>
		<author>Katie O</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=34#comment-669</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I'm becoming less revolutionary in my old age, but I'm looking at the peace movement as being hugely flawed by its tactical fights. I could see so much more being done if the movement was willing to work within and appreciate the system a bit more.

There used to be such things a checks and balances, where Congress had to vote to approve acts of war. And congress is somewhat more accountable to the people than the executive branch. Not that this has necessarily prevented every war from happening the the past, but at least there were institutions and norms that accounted for opinions outside of the executive level of government.

Perhaps the focus of the peace movement should be exposing the way the current presidential administration has crushed many foundational principles of the US Constitution--including granting supreme decision making to the executive branch. 

The Patriot Act is just one example among countless that has silenced any check on the power and decisions of those in the white house. We as an anti-war movement should be fighting to re-instate those checks and balances so that our peace constituency can have an avenue through which to be heard and accounted for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m becoming less revolutionary in my old age, but I&#8217;m looking at the peace movement as being hugely flawed by its tactical fights. I could see so much more being done if the movement was willing to work within and appreciate the system a bit more.</p>
<p>There used to be such things a checks and balances, where Congress had to vote to approve acts of war. And congress is somewhat more accountable to the people than the executive branch. Not that this has necessarily prevented every war from happening the the past, but at least there were institutions and norms that accounted for opinions outside of the executive level of government.</p>
<p>Perhaps the focus of the peace movement should be exposing the way the current presidential administration has crushed many foundational principles of the US Constitution&#8211;including granting supreme decision making to the executive branch. </p>
<p>The Patriot Act is just one example among countless that has silenced any check on the power and decisions of those in the white house. We as an anti-war movement should be fighting to re-instate those checks and balances so that our peace constituency can have an avenue through which to be heard and accounted for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on H.R. 508 to End the War by glamour-agency</title>
		<link>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=22#comment-580</link>
		<author>glamour-agency</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=22#comment-580</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Digital Photography...&lt;/strong&gt;

hey great stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Digital Photography&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>hey great stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Masters of Health Care by Katie Orlemanski</title>
		<link>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=33#comment-548</link>
		<author>Katie Orlemanski</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=33#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Another important thing to keep in mind in ATL, specifically with Grady, is how gentrification is also affecting healthcare for low-income people. Most large-scale medical resources are located in city centers--Grady as it stands now is exemplary. 

As gentrification-related displacement continues on fastforward it Atlanta, more than just rising housing costs are affecting low-income populations. The members of these communities are being pushed into suburban ghettos, further and further away from the city's heart and centralized resources such as an emergency room that serves uninsured. 

Wealthy gentrifiers increasingly commute from their homes in the city out to jobs, doctors, and schools in the suburbs that they deem "up to standard." Downtown Atlanta is socially acceptable to live in for these folks, but not necessarily for receiveing quality healthcare. Perhaps the privatization of Grady is the first sign that gentrification is determining more of the citiy's public resources than housing. 

In the mean time, low-income residents continue to find cheaper housing in the suburbs surrounded by high-end healthcare. Without financial means for a car, and cut-off from Atlanta's limited public transit, most will make do without healthcare. Or worse, not make do without.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another important thing to keep in mind in ATL, specifically with Grady, is how gentrification is also affecting healthcare for low-income people. Most large-scale medical resources are located in city centers&#8211;Grady as it stands now is exemplary. </p>
<p>As gentrification-related displacement continues on fastforward it Atlanta, more than just rising housing costs are affecting low-income populations. The members of these communities are being pushed into suburban ghettos, further and further away from the city&#8217;s heart and centralized resources such as an emergency room that serves uninsured. </p>
<p>Wealthy gentrifiers increasingly commute from their homes in the city out to jobs, doctors, and schools in the suburbs that they deem &#8220;up to standard.&#8221; Downtown Atlanta is socially acceptable to live in for these folks, but not necessarily for receiveing quality healthcare. Perhaps the privatization of Grady is the first sign that gentrification is determining more of the citiy&#8217;s public resources than housing. </p>
<p>In the mean time, low-income residents continue to find cheaper housing in the suburbs surrounded by high-end healthcare. Without financial means for a car, and cut-off from Atlanta&#8217;s limited public transit, most will make do without healthcare. Or worse, not make do without.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Propaganda Not Working In Iraq by RAT - Uttaruk.com &#187; Propaganda Not Working In Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=26#comment-33</link>
		<author>RAT - Uttaruk.com &#187; Propaganda Not Working In Iraq</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=26#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by DesperatelyObvious.com and software by Elliott Back    &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Original post by DesperatelyObvious.com and software by Elliott Back    &nbsp; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Undermining Democracy by Tyler Tarwater</title>
		<link>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=18#comment-31</link>
		<author>Tyler Tarwater</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=18#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Congress does have the power to end the war.  Currently they have no desire to do so.

Your point about those who have the "power to authorize" also have the "power to rescind" applies to the American public as well.  The premise of our government is that the public enters into the democratic system, and authorizes our elected leaders to run the government.  In this system, where we certainly had some power in authorizing our leaders, we also have the power to revoke their power when they fail to serve the public will.

By its nature, our congressional leaders are much more concerned by the opinions and desires of those who own the country, specifically corporations.  However, they are still partially vulnerable to popular movements that take action.  As a result, congress will likely only use its authority to stop the war, when the public demands it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress does have the power to end the war.  Currently they have no desire to do so.</p>
<p>Your point about those who have the &#8220;power to authorize&#8221; also have the &#8220;power to rescind&#8221; applies to the American public as well.  The premise of our government is that the public enters into the democratic system, and authorizes our elected leaders to run the government.  In this system, where we certainly had some power in authorizing our leaders, we also have the power to revoke their power when they fail to serve the public will.</p>
<p>By its nature, our congressional leaders are much more concerned by the opinions and desires of those who own the country, specifically corporations.  However, they are still partially vulnerable to popular movements that take action.  As a result, congress will likely only use its authority to stop the war, when the public demands it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Undermining Democracy by Larry Chudd</title>
		<link>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=18#comment-30</link>
		<author>Larry Chudd</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desperatelyobvious.com/?p=18#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Congress got us into this mess, and contrary to what most of us (both in and out of Congress) may think, Congress DOES have the power to get us out.

The resolution that gave George W. the “power to use force” was obtained through skilful trickery and deception (motivated by NeoCon ideology and arrogance).

Those who have the power to authorize the “Use of Force” also have the power to RECIND that authority. The sooner our Congress awakens to this facet of THEIR power, the sooner this National Nightmare will end. 

And it better end soon… before he starts wars with Iran and Syria. 
George W. is a “Rogue Executive”, and he needs to be corralled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress got us into this mess, and contrary to what most of us (both in and out of Congress) may think, Congress DOES have the power to get us out.</p>
<p>The resolution that gave George W. the “power to use force” was obtained through skilful trickery and deception (motivated by NeoCon ideology and arrogance).</p>
<p>Those who have the power to authorize the “Use of Force” also have the power to RECIND that authority. The sooner our Congress awakens to this facet of THEIR power, the sooner this National Nightmare will end. </p>
<p>And it better end soon… before he starts wars with Iran and Syria.<br />
George W. is a “Rogue Executive”, and he needs to be corralled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
